Robert Hay KC Blog

Retail Leases Act

  • “Jumping out” the Retail Leases Act – a clarification

    Today I posted an article about Verraty Pty Ltd v Richmond Football Club [2019] VCAT 1073. I have had queries about paragraph (i) where I said: “where the commencing rent under a new lease does not exceed $1,000,000 for the first 12 months,  before the lease is entered into the landlord should make an estimate

    Read more →

  • Retail premises leases can “jump out” of the Retail Leases Act

    Can a “retail premises lease” (within the meaning of s.11 of the  Retail Leases Act 2003) cease to be a “retail premises lease” during its term? That long-standing question has finally been resolved. In Verraty Pty Ltd v Richmond Football Club Ltd [2019] VCAT 1073 the Tribunal held that a lease could cease to a

    Read more →

  • ‘Ultimate consumer test” remains one of the indicia of the retail provision of services

    The CB Cold Storage and IMCC Group saga has ended. This morning the High Court of Australia refused the landlord’s application for special leave to appeal. The consequence is that the Court of Appeal’s decision in IMCC Group (Australia) Pty Ltd v CB Cold Storage Pty Ltd [2017] VSCA 178 stands and practitioners can draft

    Read more →

  • Content of default notices under s27 of Retail Leases Act

    At general law the question of whether a tenant has validly exercised an option for a further term depends upon whether the tenant has met the conditions contained in the lease for the exercise of the option. The general law has been altered by the Retail Leases Act 2003. Section 27(2) provides that: ” If

    Read more →

  • Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) likely to apply where tenant provides a service

    Where a tenant provides services from leased premises in accordance with the permitted use the lease is likely to be a “retail premises lease” and therefore governed by the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic). In every case it is necessary to identify precisely the service being provided, consider what activity is permitted under the lease

    Read more →

  • Unfair term provisions provide tenants with a new weapon

    Tenants with less than 20 employees will soon have a new weapon in disputes with landlords as a result of amendments to the Australian Consumer Law: they will be able to challenge a term in a lease that is  “unfair”. The legislation effecting the changes, the Treasury Legislation Amendment (Small Business and Unfair Contract Terms)

    Read more →

  • Rent reviews – mandatory or at the landlord’s discretion?

    The issue of whether a lease requires a rent review or whether the review is at the discretion of the landlord often arises. The problem can avoided by clear drafting. In Growthpoint Properties Australian Limited v Austalia Pacific Airports [2014] VSC 556 the court had to decide whether a rent review was mandatory under the

    Read more →

  • Changes to excluded retail premises

    The Retail Leases Act 2003 excludes from the definition of “retail premises” premises in respect of which the “occupancy costs” under the lease is more than the amount prescribed by the regulations. See: s.4(2)(a). Before 22 April 2013 the amount prescribed by the regulations was $1,000,000 per annum. From 22 April 2013 the amount prescribed is $1,000,000 per

    Read more →

  • Section 52 – when is the lease “entered into”?

    There is a translation key (widget) on the mirrored blog for ease of reading for non-English speaking members of the public or professionals. The mirrored blog can be found at http://roberthaybarrister.blogspot.com.au/   Section 52 of the Retail Leases Act 2003  is proving to be a difficult provision to apply. Section 52 implies into a retail premises lease a

    Read more →

Instagram / TikTok / X

Designed with WordPress